Animal Testing The Best Option For Medical Progress Essay

Most arguments in favor of the use of animal testing for scientific use lead to the benefits it has for humans. Animal research has contributed to virtually every major medical advancement - for both human and veterinary health. From antibiotics to blood transfusion, from dialysis to organ transplantation, from vaccinations to chemotherapy, surgery and joint replacement, virtually every current treatment, cure and restraint of disease is based on understanding attained through research with lab animals. For example, dogs and fish were used for the development of insulin, which is now able to help control diabetes. The House of Lords Select Committee, the Parliamentary Animal Procedures Committee and the independent Nuffield Council on Bioethics all agreed that testing on animals is a scientifically sound method, has developed great results and is important for future advances (Pro-Test). Animal testing is viewed as the best option for medical progress, since it has had much success i n the past. Robert Koch, a Nobel prize winner, conducted experiments on animals and stated, â€Å"Think you’re in the running for a future Nobel prize in medicine? You may want to consider using animals in your studies†¦ More than two-thirds of all nobel prizes in medicine have been awarded for discoveries that involved animal research† (Hayhurst 21). Animal testing was essential in the development of many life-saving surgical procedures that were once unimaginable. With the medical advances throughShow MoreRelatedThe Horror that is Animal Testing 970 Words   |  4 Pages do you know what animals have gone through to get it on the shelves? It is something we’ll never have to imagine going through, so why should animals? Animal testing is not necessary. Animals simply don’t have a choice if they want to be experimentd on. What makes me angry, is there are alternative methods to testing, so animals don’t need to suffer. Animals have to endure terrible pain, fear, and loneliness, which is cruel and mean on our part. The pros and cons to testing don’t even out. ClearyRead MorePros And Cons Of Animal Testing905 Words   |  4 PagesAnimal testing has been the target of animal cruelty groups since the beginning of its existence, but the benefits it provides, humans and animals far greater than the type of method that is used to get the results. Scientists Karl Landsteiner’s success in finding a cure to polio is an example of how the benefits of animal testing helped better future human lives. In his experiments he discovered that Polio viruses had three variations, meaning that they would have to produce a product that couldRead MoreAnimal Testing Essay1194 Words   |  5 PagesUsing helpless animals for the benefit of human beings goes back thousands of years. A common theme has been present: the use of these animals has been necessary for survival. Of late, these essential sacrifices have metamorphosed into yield-less speculations. Animal testing is wrong based on these premises: there are available alternatives to direct testing on live animals, the results acquired rom the tests are inaccurate and repetitive, and ultimately it is speciesism, which is comparable to racismRead More The Benefits of Xenotransplantation Essay1535 Words   |  7 PagesThe Benefits of Xenot ransplantation New technology has opened many doors of opportunity for advancements in medical science. Not even in our wildest dreams would we have imagined a world where animal organs could be safely transplanted into humans. A few years ago, this process called xenotransplantation, was completed for the very first time. The only dilemma critics had with the process involved the chances of infection and organ rejection from the patient. Through experimentation and advancesRead MoreAnimal Experimentation Should Be Stopped1389 Words   |  6 Pages Each year there are more than 100 million animals used for experimentation in the United States (Experiments on Animals: Overview). These animals are subjected to appalling conditions during the research period. They are locked up in cramped quarters, denied basic rights, and forced into agonizing experimentation; often times with little prevail, for the benefit of humans. Animal experimentation should be stopped because not only is it morally wrong, but also the results are typically inaccurateRead MoreIs Animals For Medical Research Necessary?1736 Words   |  7 PagesIs using animals in medical research necessary? Some people would say yes, others would say no... but who s right? No matter what one thinks or believes this question still remains, yet to be answered. At first this question seems like its answer lies within ones opinion and only that, but if you look closer there is a lot more to it than opinion. Feeling sorry for the animals is definitely where it starts for people who don t agree with animal testing; but that s not where it ends. ScientistsRead MoreClinical Trials And The Medical Field1407 Words   |  6 PagesClinical trials are research processes that test the safety and effectiveness of various medical treatments using ethical means (â€Å"What are Clinical Trials†). They are performed to discover new, effective, and practical cures for many conditions including cancers. Whenever a new possible drug or potential cure is introduced into the medical field, it enters the clinical process in order to be analyzed and assessed for possible flaws and to maximize effectiveness. Clinical trials are essential to developmentRead MoreAnimal Testing Should Be Banned2359 Words   |  10 Pages Animals Save Human Lives Mahatma Gandhi, preeminent leader of Indian independence movement, once said that â€Å"the greatness of nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated.† In the light of it, animals rights have been dealing for a long time in means of morality. It is not a surprise that animals are engaged many parts of human as animals have been live with human from the beginning. Beyond whether animal testing is right or wrong, animal testing should beRead MoreH1N11606 Words   |  7 Pagesenvironmental samples that cause threats to the public’s health. Has a filling between 51-75% in laboratory IDHS policy-making as it assumes all risks of human testing, animals, and the environment to determine pesticides, pollutants and all the dangers to which humanity is exposed through routine testing. For the assessment of progress, there have not yet been developed exercises and tests to check the capacity of the laboratory, but these critical activity requirements still work. QuantitativeRead MoreThe Pros and Cons of Animal Testing2973 Words   |  12 Pagescabinet has been tested on an animal at one point or another. A government funded corporation called the Food and Drug Administration, abbreviated as the FDA, is in charge of making sure that all drugs, cosmetics, biological products, and more are efficient, secure, and safe for human usage. The FDA will not allow any drug to be released or sold to the human population if it has not first been tested on animals. In fact, when a drug is first created it is tested on animals before humans are even allowed